We must remember that Apple is not moving to 'Arm' but to 'Apple Silicon' which has ARM cores but in addition to ARM coarse, there are a half dozen other cores. Look at the wishlist on this forum and how little of the great ideas has been implemented yet. Then it may just be easier to use the emulator.Īnyone who can make a good prediction has signed an iron-clad NDAĪgain, I rather have Adesk focus on one version with fewer bugs and better features than to get tangled up in multiple versions that kind of work half-good. Maybe it is reasonable to make an ARM version, but not an optimized one. It has to work optimally on all modern AMD and Intel CPUs with a multitude of windows versions. It is a lot of work to make a software take advantage of all the CPU features. This gives us many manufacturers unlike the Intel/AMD duoploy, but it isn't standardized. That may be the larger hurdle since those smaller companies are important for Revit, but may not have the resources to maintain twice the software.ĪRM is more a license scheme and licensees can make their own versions. It also will depend on if the add-ins will need to be converted to ARM. Maybe architects like Macs, but for engineers that is unlikely. I know most engineering software exists on x86 only. IF Adesk makes an ARM version depends on how THEY think the demand will be.

This may be a large exercise to put Intel on notice and to keep options open. Main reason apple is doing that they are not happy with Intel progress over the last years. So it isn't clear how many Macs will actually be in the wild with ARM.Īpple also can change their mind within the 2 years, depending on what trouble they run into or if Intel/AMD come up with a really great x86 alternative.

So it is all speculation on how powerful that will be, and if the high-end Macs will get ARM before the 2 year transition. Apple even will still introduce new x86 computers over the next 2 years.

Revit for mac 2021